IDT 21/2022
The Aggrieved was contracted to work with the company for two years, but was terminated due to inconsistent/poor performance.
The Aggrieved contended that though he was on a probationary period, the reasons for termination must be established, and the Company unfairly terminated him.
IDT 47/2022
IDT 21/2014
Summary
The aggrieved was employed by the company, from 1987. On July 12, 2013, company workers were informed that changes would occur, affecting some jobs. The aggrieved then received a job offer from another firm, who she believed would take over operations
IDT 17/2008
The matter, which surrounded the aggrieved’s termination by the company was initially referred to the Tribunal by the Ministry of Labour, afterwhich, both parties submitted briefs and requested to commence local level discussions. On October 23, 2009, the parties then submitted
IDT 30/2017
IDT 22/2021
IDT 21/2021
IDT 11/2018
IDT 13/2022
IDT 10/2020
IDT 29/2020
IDT 5/2009
The Authority reduced the benefits for a particular department of their organisation. The Association represented the workers in the department as the reduction was deemed unfair.
The Authority contended that they exercised their right to reduce these benefits per their