IDT 10/2016
IDT 24/2016
IDT 62/2016
IDT 8/2013
IDT 45/2017
IDT 33/2015
IDT 7/2009
IDT 25/2020
IDT 6/2008
Summary
The Aggrieved’s employment was terminated by the University on grounds of “Unauthorised Absence” and she sought the representation of the Union in this matter.
The University contended that they had just cause for the dismissal of the Aggrieved as her
IDT 11/2022
IDT 10/2011
The aggrieved workers were accused of facilitating fraudulent transactions from the remittance service of the company from an anonymous source. The company subsequently suspended both workers, conducted an investigation and convened a disciplinary hearing. They were consequently dismissed on September 3,
