Amount Awarded: Assorted Benefits and (or) Increases

IDT 41/2018

Department of Correctional Services v. JAFEDCO & The Senior Uniform Officers Association

Due to overcrowding and staff shortages at the correctional center, day shift officers were required to extend their work into the early night shift starting at 3:30 PM. They argued for additional meal and taxi allowances alongside a Special Extraordinary Allowance, referencing a 2007

IDT 5/2009

Jamaica Aviation Inspectors Association v. The Jamaica Civil Aviation Authority

Summary

The Authority reduced the benefits for a particular department of their organisation. The Association represented the workers in the department as the reduction was deemed unfair.

The Authority contended that they exercised their right to reduce these benefits per their

IDT 25/2013

National Commercial Bank Jamaica Ltd. v. National Commercial Bank Staff Association

Summary

The dispute arose from the decision by the company to discontinue the "Holiday House" benefit, which had been historically provided to staff, originally by a previous entity before its acquisition by the company. The Association opposed this decision, leading to a

IDT 29/2013

National Commercial Bank Jamaica Ltd. v. National Commercial Bank Staff Association

The dispute arose from the decision by the company to discontinue the "Holiday House" benefit, which had been historically provided to staff, originally by a previous entity before its acquisition by the company. The Association opposed this decision, leading to a dispute, and referral

IDT 31/2022

Sangster’s Bookstores Limited v The National Workers Union

IDT 30/2015

Seaport Equipment Limited v. Bustamante Industrial Trade Union

Summary

The Union started negotiating for improved wages and benefits on the Workers’ behalf. They were able to agree on some of the terms, and sought the intervention of the IDT on the rest.

The Union contended that the other terms

IDT 11/2023

UC Rusal Ltd. v. UCASE

IDT 1/2017

UC Rusal Ltd. v. UCASE

IDT 12/2019

UC Rusal Ltd. v. UCASE

Scroll to Top