emc-logo-vertical-166

Archives: Database

IDT 1/2019

Brand Development Ltd. (T/A Ibero Star) v. Trevor Beadle

C.H. Gayle Company Ltd. v. Bailey 

Case Name: C.H. Gayle Company Ltd. v. Bailey Dispute No: IDT 63/2017 Date: January 8, 2020 Type of Case: Termination of contract by way of abandonment Bargaining Level: Individual (Rights) Summary of Facts: Bailey, a bartender at Triple Century Sports Bar, was sent on two

C.H. Gayle Company Ltd. v. Bailey 

Case Name: C.H. Gayle Company Ltd. v. Bailey Dispute No: IDT 63/2017 Date: January 8, 2020 Type of Case: Termination of contract by way of abandonment Bargaining Level: Individual (Rights) Summary of Facts: Bailey, a bartender at Triple Century Sports Bar, was sent on two

IDT 11/2015

Cable and Wireless v. Winston Sewell

Summary

In January 2014, the company began outsourcing its functions to another entity to cut operational costs. Initially, the aggrieved was informed that his position would be outsourced, marking him for redundancy. However, because he was two months short of retirement age,

IDT 19/2019

Caribbean Airlines Ltd. v. JAPA

IDT 52/2016

Caymanas Track Limited v. Union of Technical Administrative & Supervisory Personnel

Summary

The Union members, formerly the Engineering Department personnel, were placed on administrative leave with their employment later terminated for an industrial action which saw the Company suffering $30 Million in losses.

The Company contended that the matter was

IDT 21/2014

Chatermagnates Limited v. Norma Roberts

Summary

The aggrieved was employed by the company, from 1987. On July 12, 2013, company workers were informed that changes would occur, affecting some jobs. The aggrieved then received a job offer from another firm, who she believed would take over operations

IDT 17/2009

City of Kingston Co-operative Credit Union Ltd. v NWU

Summary

The Union represented six workers whose positions were made redundant by the Company.

The Company contended that the redundancy was justified based on the prevailing economic circumstances at the time, and contended that they adhered to the procedures established under

IDT 17/2008

Creative Production & Training Centre Limited v. The University and Allied Workers Union (UAWU)

Summary

The matter, which surrounded the aggrieved’s termination by the company was initially referred to the Tribunal by the Ministry of Labour, afterwhich, both parties submitted briefs and requested to commence local level discussions. On October 23, 2009, the parties then submitted

IDT 41/2018

Department of Correctional Services v. JAFEDCO & The Senior Uniform Officers Association

Due to overcrowding and staff shortages at the correctional center, day shift officers were required to extend their work into the early night shift starting at 3:30 PM. They argued for additional meal and taxi allowances alongside a Special Extraordinary Allowance, referencing a 2007

IDT 37/2018

Devon House Development Ltd. v. Keniel Gayle

IDT 17/2018

Dolphin Cove Limited v. Aldaine Johnson Et Al
Scroll to Top