IDT 11/2018
IDT 51/2019
IDT 30/2022
IDT 13/2022
IDT 16/2020
IDT 11/2003
The Union sought to represent the Aggrieved who was summarily dismissed from her employment on grounds of gross disrespect and insubordination.
The Company contended that the grounds on which the Aggrieved was dismissed were justifiable owing to a fracas that ensued on the
IDT 9/2010
The Company initiated redundancy and lay-off proceedings. The Union and Company subsequently agreed to postpone redundancy, but the Company disbursed redundancy payments and letters to the workers anyway. The company later reopened on a phased basis but did not re-employ union delegates and only
IDT 2/2023
IDT 15/2023
IDT 2/2022
IDT 16/2007
Summary
The company granted the aggrieved leave, after an individual requested vacation on his behalf. The company however soon learned that the aggrieved had been convicted of assault and sentenced to ten days of hard labor during his leave. He was then
IDT 20/2018