IDT 1/2004
Summary
In July 2002, the Union claimed that most employees at the Company were union members and sought recognition for bargaining rights. The company suggested involving the Ministry of Labour, which prepared a ballot for February 2004. The company obtained an injunction
IDT 25/2013
The dispute arose from the decision by the company to discontinue the "Holiday House" benefit, which had been historically provided to staff, originally by a previous entity before its acquisition by the company. The Association opposed this decision, leading to a
IDT 29/2013
The dispute arose from the decision by the company to discontinue the "Holiday House" benefit, which had been historically provided to staff, originally by a previous entity before its acquisition by the company. The Association opposed this decision, leading to a dispute, and referral
IDT 10/2016
IDT 24/2016
IDT 62/2016
IDT 58/2017
IDT 22/2022
IDT 50/2019
IDT 30/2016
IDT 9/2020
IDT 39/2019
