Other Forum: Supreme Court (Judicial Review)

IDT 11/2015

Cable and Wireless v. Winston Sewell

Summary

In January 2014, the company began outsourcing its functions to another entity to cut operational costs. Initially, the aggrieved was informed that his position would be outsourced, marking him for redundancy. However, because he was two months short of retirement age,

IDT 21/2014

Chatermagnates Limited v. Norma Roberts

Summary

The aggrieved was employed by the company, from 1987. On July 12, 2013, company workers were informed that changes would occur, affecting some jobs. The aggrieved then received a job offer from another firm, who she believed would take over operations

IDT 37/2018

Devon House Development Ltd. v. Keniel Gayle

IDT 32/2019

Jerky’s Bar & Grill Ltd v. Donalds

IDT 48/2017

Manor Court Ltd. v. Barbara Rigbye

Scroll to Top