IDT 5/2023
IDT 1/2004
Summary
In July 2002, the Union claimed that most employees at the Company were union members and sought recognition for bargaining rights. The company suggested involving the Ministry of Labour, which prepared a ballot for February 2004. The company obtained an injunction
IDT 25/2013
The dispute arose from the decision by the company to discontinue the "Holiday House" benefit, which had been historically provided to staff, originally by a previous entity before its acquisition by the company. The Association opposed this decision, leading to a
IDT 29/2013
The dispute arose from the decision by the company to discontinue the "Holiday House" benefit, which had been historically provided to staff, originally by a previous entity before its acquisition by the company. The Association opposed this decision, leading to a dispute, and referral
IDT 10/2016
IDT 24/2016
IDT 62/2016
IDT 39/2019
IDT 8/2013
IDT 33/2022
IDT 12/2021
IDT 45/2017
