IDT 20/2021
IDT 21/2021
IDT 11/2018
IDT 51/2019
IDT 30/2022
IDT 13/2022
IDT 12/2006
Summary
The Company made seventy-four employees redundant. All workers, except the four aggrieved accepted the terms of redundancy. The union contested the aggrieved worker’s dismissals, though the company rejected the Union’s contentions, leading the matter to be referred to the IDT.
IDT 16/2020
IDT 10/2020
IDT 11/2003
The Union sought to represent the Aggrieved who was summarily dismissed from her employment on grounds of gross disrespect and insubordination.
The Company contended that the grounds on which the Aggrieved was dismissed were justifiable owing to a fracas that ensued on the
IDT 29/2020
IDT 9/2010
The Company initiated redundancy and lay-off proceedings. The Union and Company subsequently agreed to postpone redundancy, but the Company disbursed redundancy payments and letters to the workers anyway. The company later reopened on a phased basis but did not re-employ union delegates and only