IDT 11/2003
The Union sought to represent the Aggrieved who was summarily dismissed from her employment on grounds of gross disrespect and insubordination.
The Company contended that the grounds on which the Aggrieved was dismissed were justifiable owing to a fracas that ensued on the
IDT 16/2007
Summary
The company granted the aggrieved leave, after an individual requested vacation on his behalf. The company however soon learned that the aggrieved had been convicted of assault and sentenced to ten days of hard labor during his leave. He was then
IDT 10/2011
The aggrieved workers were accused of facilitating fraudulent transactions from the remittance service of the company from an anonymous source. The company subsequently suspended both workers, conducted an investigation and convened a disciplinary hearing. They were consequently dismissed on September 3,
